Arma 3 Nuke Mod

1. Arma 3 Nuke Mod

ByWhile hyper-realistic and extremely difficult shooters are all the rage now with games like Squad and Rising Storm 2: Vietnam, the critically acclaimed Arma has the main tent pole of that sub-genre for a long time.Offering more than just a gritty and difficult military experience, Arma is a franchise that's also always been known for its stellar mods, with titans like DayZ arriving in earlier series entries.The game's third installment is no exception - and there's a reason why four years after its release, is still going strong on the mod front. Currently, players have access to more than 40,000 various map, item, scenario, and overhaul mods across the Steam Workshop and various modding sites.It's impossible to go through all of these independently, so we've done some of the leg work and curated 10 of the top-notch mods for Arma 3 that show off what's possible with a little bit of modding know-how and a lot of ingenuity. CUP WeaponsWith more than 40k mods available, obviously there's been a lot of collaboration between community members - and that's where the CUP (Community Upgrade Project) mods come in.The Weapons version of these mod packs strives to bring in extra content (specifically from the previous Arma titles) into the third main entry, extending out the number of weapons available and tweaking those new arms to match the game's functionality.Machine guns, shotguns, rifles, grenade launchers, pistols, sniper rifles, and a host of attachments are all added here. Jurassic PropsUnlike a lot of other mods, this one doesn't radically change the whole game, except perhaps in tone. Yes, that's the gateway to Jurassic Park you see there. While rather limited at the moment (the gate doesn't actually open and there are no dinos), the mod does add in a bunch of JP themed objects that will definitely alter the feel of any given Arma 3 match.I can't wait to see where this one goes, and hopefully someone will pick up the torch and carry us to the finish line with a dinosaur total overhaul in the same vein as all those zombie mods. Apex Species SharksThis mod really shows the dedication (and sometimes oddity) of the Arma modding community.

The Unsung team, working on an authentic Vietnam-era mod pack since OFP brings you realistic jungle fighting, hand-to-hand combat and fully 3-dimensional warfare in this immersive mod pack for Arma 3.

Does this military shooter really need hyper-realistic sharks based on extensive research by the Australian Institute of Marine Science? I can't say that it particularly does, but we got it anyway.The mod adds in male and female sharks that swim around, hunt, bleed, behave differently in night and day, and only become aggressive if there aren't any other large fish food sources around. If you want to take time off from war to study marine biology, then have it my friend!

Zombies And DemonsIf modding has taught us anything, its that people want zombies added to everything. Another entry in a long line of mods that throw hordes of the walking dead into a shooter, Zombies And Demons shines by being customizable - letting you decide just how strong those zombies are (from barely standing shambling dead to super powered hellish monstrosities).Sure, we've left realism behind at this point, but who doesn't want to skip the typical warfare to gun down some walkers every now and again? Featured ContributorTy splits his time between writing horror fiction and writing about video games. After 25 years of gaming, Ty can firmly say that gaming peaked with Planescape Torment, but that doesn't mean he doesn't have a soft spot for games like Baldur's Gate, Fallout: New Vegas, Bioshock Infinite, and Horizon: Zero Dawn. He has previously written for GamerU and MetalUnderground. He also writes for PortalMonkey covering gaming laptops and peripherals&period.

B61 training unit intended for ground crew. It accurately replicates the shape and size of a 'live' B61 (together with its safety/arming mechanisms) but contains only inert materialsTypeService historyUsed byUnited StatesProduction historyDesignerDesigned1963ManufacturerProduced1968 (full production)No. built3,155Variants12SpecificationsMass700 pounds (320 kg)Length11 feet 8 inches (3.56 m)Diameter13 inches (33 cm)Blast yieldBelieved to be either 0.3–340 kt or 0.3-400 kt in the weapon's various mods.The B61 is the primary in the United States following the end of the. It is a low to intermediate-yield and featuring a two-stage design.The B61 is of the ('dial-a-yield' in informal military jargon) design with a yield of 0.3 to 340 kilotons in its various mods. It has a streamlined casing capable of withstanding supersonic flight speeds. The weapon is 11 ft 8 in (3.56 m) long, with a diameter of about 13 inches (33 cm). Basic weight is about 700 pounds (320 kg), although the weights of individual weapons may vary depending on version and /retardation configuration.

B61 bomb casing;, North Canton, Ohio.The B61, known before 1968 as the TX-61, was designed in 1963. It was designed and built by the in. It began from a program for a lightweight, streamlined weapon launched in 1961. Production engineering began in 1965, with full production beginning in 1968 following a series of development problems. Shot in June 1966 may have been a full yield test of the weapon with other tests conducted between 1963 and 1968 at the Nevada Test Site.Total production of all versions was approximately 3,155, of which approximately 540 remain in active service, 415 in inactive service and 520 are awaiting dismantlement as of 2012.13 versions of the B61 have been designed, known as Mod 0 through Mod 12. Of these, nine have entered production. Each shares the same, with different options.

The newest variant is the Mod 11, deployed in 1997, which is a ground-penetrating weapon. The Russian facility at, finished in early 1996, was designed to resist US earth-penetrating warheads and serves a similar role as the American. The timing of the Kosvinsky completion date is regarded as one explanation for U.S.

Interest in a new nuclear bunker buster and the declaration of the deployment of the Mod 11 in 1997: Kosvinsky is protected by about 1,000 feet (300 m) of.The B61 should not be confused with the, which was originally developed under the bomber designation B-61.Deployment. B61 bomb components. The nuclear physics package is contained in the silver cylinder centre-leftThe B61 has been deployed by a variety of U.S. Aircraft cleared for its use have included the, Lancer, Spirit, Stratofortress;, and;, and; and;, and IDS aircraft. USAFE and all dual role aircraft can carry B61s.180 B61 bombs (in tactical variants) are deployed with NATO allies in Europe as part of the. NATO has agreed to vastly improve the capabilities of this force with the increased accuracy of the Mod 12 upgrade and the delivery of the stealthy F-35.

This will, for the first time, add a modest capability to the B61.The B61 can fit inside the 's weapons bays and will also be carried by the. Internal nuclear components of the B61 bomb. The bomb was assembled at the and.The B61 is a (formally known as FUFO or 'full fuzing option', and 'dial-a-yield' colloquially) dual use tactical and strategic bomb designed for external carriage by high-speed aircraft. It has a streamlined casing capable of withstanding supersonic flight speeds. The weapon is 11 feet 8 inches (3.56 m) long, with a diameter of about 13 inches (330 mm) and a basic weight of about 700 pounds (320 kg), except for the Mod 11 version which has a weight of approximately 1,200 pounds (540 kg).The B61 is armed by ground-based personnel via an access panel located on the side of the bomb, which opens to reveal 9 dials, 2 sockets and a T-handle which manually triggers the 'command disable' function. One of the sockets is a MC4142 'strike enable' plug which must be inserted in order to complete critical circuits in the safety/arming and firing mechanisms.

The other socket is the connector located in the top right hand corner of the arming panel, which has 23 pins marked with alphabetic letter codes.The B61 also features a 'command disable' mechanism, which functions as follows: after entering the correct 3-digit numeric code it is then possible to turn a dial to 'DI' and pull back a T-shaped handle which comes away in the user's hand. This action releases a spring-loaded which fires the on an MC4246A, powering it up. Electrical power from the thermal battery is sufficient to 'fry' the internal circuitry of the bomb, destroying critical mechanisms without causing detonation. This makes the bomb incapable of being used. Any B61 which has had the command disable facility used must be returned to for repair.The B61 can be set for airburst, parachute retarded airburst, parachute retarded ground burst, or laydown detonation, and can be released at speeds up to Mach 2 and altitudes as low as 50 feet (15 m).

In the weapon's, it detonates 31 seconds after weapon release. The Mod 0 to 10 versions of the B61 are equipped with a retarder (currently a 24-ft (7.3 m) diameter / chute) to slow the weapon in its descent. This offers the aircraft a chance to escape the blast in its retarded modes, or allows the weapon to survive impact with the ground in mode.The Mod 11 is the newest variant. A hardened penetration bomb with a reinforced casing and a delayed-action, this allows the weapon to penetrate several metres into the ground before detonating, damaging fortified structures further underground. Developed from 1994, the Mod 11 went into service in 1997 replacing the older -yield. About 50 Mod 11 bombs have been produced, their warheads converted from Mod 7 bombs. At present, the primary carrier for the Mod 11 is the.In May 2010 the National Nuclear Security Administration asked Congress for $40 million to redesign the bomb to enable the to carry the weapon internally by 2017.

This version is designated Mod 12. The four hundred Mod 12 bombs will be used by both tactical aircraft (such as the F-35) and strategic aircraft (such as the B-2) and the Tail Subassembly (TSA) will give them levels of accuracy, allowing the fifty kiloton warhead to have strategic effects from all carrying aircraft.

However, refitting the 400 weapons is now expected to cost over $10 billion. The Mod 12 tail assembly contract was awarded to on November 27, 2012 for $178 million. Boeing will use their experience with the Joint Direct Attack Munition to yield JDAM-equivalent accuracy in a nuclear bomb.

This contract is only the first part of the billion dollar expense of producing and applying the tail kits, over and above the $10 billion cost to refurbish the warheads. The Mod 12 uses an internal guidance system and can glide to its target.

On 1 July 2015, the (NNSA) conducted the first of three flight tests of the Mod 12 tail kit assembly.The B61 has 13 variants, referred to as Mod 0 through Mod 12.ModStatusDateNumber producedRoleYieldsPAL typeNotes0Retired1968 to?500Cat BFirst production weapons1Retired1969 to?700StrategicUnknown to 340 ktNone2Retired1975 to?235Cat D3Active1979 to present545Tactical0.3, 1.5, 60 or 170 ktCat F4Active1979 to present695Tactical0.3, 1.5, 10 or 45 ktCat F5Retired1977 to?265Strategic? To 340 ktCat D6Never entered production??Cat DRetrofit of Mod 07Active1985 to present600Strategic10,?

Or 340 kt, allegedly 4 yield settings.Cat DRetrofit of Mod 18Never entered production?Cat DRetrofit of Mod 2 and Mod 59Never entered production?Cat FRetrofit of Mod 010Inactive stockpile1990 to present215Tactical0.3, 5, 10 or 80 ktCat FRemanufactured from retired warheads.11Active1997 to present50Tactical/StrategicEither 0.3,? Or 340 kt or 400 ktCat FA retrofit of the Mod 712In development2019 onwards400 to 500 weapons plannedTactical/Strategic0.3, 1.5, 10 or 50 ktCat FGPS guided, earth penetrating weaponMod 12 As of 2013, the Pentagon was asking for an $11 billion life-extension program for the B61 bomb, which would be the most ambitious and expensive nuclear warhead refurbishment in history.

Congress is opposed to this effort for cost and timeline issues and questions for the B61's need. Cost estimates have doubled from $4 billion to $8 billion and production slipped from 2017 to 2020, then grew to $10 billion for life extension plus $1 billion for tail guidance kits and production was delayed to 2021. Sequestration budget cuts in early 2013 have delayed any start until 2020. The stated that extending the life of B61s and consolidating its variants may not be a cheap and low-risk method to meet military requirements. The Mod 12 is to replace the previous Mod 3, 4, 7, and 10 versions with 400–500 planned with a service life of 20 years. Refurbishing the existing variants and eliminating the guidance kit would save $2–3 billion. There are also questions about the future structure of gravity nuclear bombs.

European deployments of warheads by NATO countries are cited as a reason for the low-yield Mod 12. With reductions planned of nuclear weapons in Europe, which may retire the older Mod 3 and 4 and the Mod 10 already slated for retirement, and the possibility that European nations may not build or procure new aircraft to carry the Mod 12 would eliminate the need for consolidation into a new type. While the is not as old as the B61, the Pentagon sees it as a 'relic of the Cold War,' believing that deploying a megaton-yield gravity bomb, the highest level nuclear weapon left in the U.S. Inventory, to Europe is 'inconceivable' at this point.

It also can only be carried by the B-2 bomber, and integrating it onto additional aircraft would be costly. The Mod 12 upgrade is being pursued as a forward-deployed tactical nuclear weapon to protect NATO and Asian allies since it can be used from dual-capable fighter aircraft, as well as planned to arm the F-35 and, and its lower yield options make it more flexible with less collateral effects. Recapitalizing the B61 is hoped to lead to the retirement of the B83, resulting in the elimination of the last megaton-yield U.S. Bomb and leave the B61-series as the only U.S. Gravity nuclear bomb.The Pentagon and NNSA have stated that if B61 refurbishment does not begin by 2019, components in the existing weapons could begin to fail. Tom Collina of the has said that the new development could complicate arms control efforts with Russia. In 2014 Congress slashed funding for the project and called for alternates to be studied.In January 2014, former Air Force Chief of Staff confirmed that the Mod 12 nuclear bomb upgrade would have enhanced accuracy and a lower yield with less fallout compared to previous versions of the weapon.

Accuracy has not been a guarantee for air-dropped nuclear weapons, so consequently large warheads were needed to effectively impact a target; the Mod 11 nuclear earth-penetrator is accurate to 110–170 meters from the desired detonation location, so it requires a 400-kiloton warhead. The Mod 12 is accurate to 30 meters from a target and only requires a 50-kiloton warhead. Schwartz believes that greater accuracy would both improve the weapon and create a different target set it can be useful against. An example is the higher-yield Mod 11's role of attacking underground bunkers that need a ground burst to create a crater and destroy it through the shockwave. A 50-kiloton yield detonating on the ground produces a crater with a radius of 30–68 meters, depending on the density of the surface, effectively putting the bunker within the.Critics say that a more accurate and less destructive nuclear weapon would make leaders less cautious about deploying it, but Schwartz says it would deter adversaries more because the U.S. Would be more willing to use it in situations where necessary. The Mod 12 is also important for modernization of European nuclear stocks.

Arma 3 Nuke Mod

The improved accuracy makes it more effective than the previous Mod 3/4 currently deployed to the continent. F-16 and Panavia Tornado aircraft cannot interface with the new bomb due to electronic differences, but NATO countries that are buying the F-35 will be able to utilize it. The first flight test for an inert Mod 12 was conducted in 2015, with a second successful test in August 2017.In November 2015, a test of the Mod 12 was conducted where the bomb penetrated underground, showing its potential as a nuclear earth-penetrator. Although ground penetration was not an objective of the Mod 12 upgrade, it could allow it to take up the penetrating mission of the Mod 11, which has no life-extension planned and will expire in the 2030s. Being able to penetrate underground increases its effectiveness against buried targets, as it more efficiently transmits explosive energy through enhanced ground-shock coupling, allowing its max yield of 50 kilotons underground to have the equivalent surface-burst capability of a 750 kt to 1.25 megaton weapon. The Mod 12's increased accuracy and earth-penetration capability allows a lower strike yield to be selected, reducing radioactive fallout risk, potentially making it more attractive to military planners. However the Mod 12 does not have the reinforced structure of the Mod 11 which will be retained in service for the ground penetrating mission.The Mod 12 Life Extension Program continued in 2018 and on 29 June 2018 two successful non-nuclear system qualification flight tests at Tonopah Test Range were reported.

In October 2018, the Mod 12 guided tail-kit assembly received Milestone C approval to enter the production phase; the TKA went through the traditional test program in under 11 months, achieving a 100% success rate for all 31 bomb drops. See also. Nuclear weapon archive. 9 January 2007. Retrieved 2018-03-28. ^ Kristensen, Hans; Norris, Robert (27 November 2015).

'The B61 family of nuclear bombs'. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

70 (3): 79–84. Sublette, Carey (9 January 2007). Nuclear weapon archive. Retrieved 2012-06-09. ^ Norris, Robert; Kristensen, Hans; Handler, Joshua (January 2003). Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists January/February 2003. Pp. 74–76.

(PDF). Union of Concerned Scientists. Retrieved 8 July 2017. February 2012. Archived from on April 24, 2013.

(April 1, 1997), The, Global security. Global Security. Weapons of mass destruction.

'The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists', 26 October 2013. Kristensen, Hans M. Federation of American Scientists, 2 May 2012.

Borger, Julian (21 April 2013). The Guardian. Retrieved 11 June 2013.

Kristensen, Hans M. (30 October 2013).

Archived from on 2013-11-01. Retrieved 30 October 2013. Grant, Rebecca., July 2010. ^.

Retrieved 2012-06-09. ^. Retrieved 2012-07-08. US Department of Energy. Event occurs at 11m 56s.

Retrieved 10 July 2017., Global security news wire, May 18, 2010. (PDF), Sage pub, 2011. Kristensen, Hans. FAS, 15 June 2011. Kristensen, Hans. FAS, 26 July 2012., Deagel, November 27, 2012., Media room.

Kristensen, Hans. 2013-07-18 at the FAS, 12 April 2013. ^, Flight global, 10 July 2015. (PDF). Archived from (PDF) on 2017-05-15. Retrieved 2018-02-03.

CS1 maint: Archived copy as title. Weiner, Sarah (2014-01-27)., Air force mag, 4 November 2013. Reif, Kingston (2013-10-25). Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved October 25, 2013. Rabechault, Mathieu (6 November 2013). Retrieved 7 November 2013.

Guarino, Douglas P. (16 January 2014). Nuclear Threat Initiative. Global Security Newswire. Retrieved 16 January 2014. ^, Fas, 23 January 2014. Keck, Zachary (13 July 2015).

National interest. The National Interest.

Retrieved 13 July 2015. Fas.org, 14 January 2016.

Miles, Aaron (18 May 2019). Center for the National Interest. Retrieved 7 June 2019. GlobalSecurity.org.

Air Recognition. 10 December 2018.External links Wikimedia Commons has media related to., As U.S. Modernizes Nuclear Weapons, 'Smaller' Leaves Some Uneasy (information), New York Times, 11 January 2016. (Google You tube), AEC., Weapons of mass destruction (information), Global Security., 1997, an anti-nuclear weapons organization. Nelson, Robert W (January–February 2001), 54 (1), Federation of American Scientists.

Norris, Robert S; Kristensen, Hans M; Handler, Joshua (2003), 59: 74–76,:., Glenn’s museum.